• Who We Are
    • The Climate Trust
    • Climate Trust Capital
    • Achievements
    • Leadership And Board Of Directors
  • What We Do
    • Action
    • Impact
    • Case Studies
  • Financials
  • Media
    • Blog
    • News & Press
The Climate Trust | Scorcher: When economic modeling meets carbon policies

Scorcher: When economic modeling meets carbon policies

Policy, Scorcher

Sheldon Zakreski, The Climate Trust
Weekly Policy and Finance Update – April 17, 2017

When economic modeling meets carbon policies

Whenever new environmental policies are proposed it is necessary to establish what they will cost. Cue the economists. Economic models can quickly dominate climate policy discussions with insights ranging from a slight impact to economic damnation. The damnation piece is troubling. The Washington Post noted that the George W. Bush administration used an economic study citing costs of $350 billion to comply with the Kyoto Protocol as an example of how committing to climate reduction would mean the end of the American way of life as we know it. Yet the government spent that much by mid-2006 in the war on Iraq with barely a dent on the breakneck economic growth of the 2000s.

Back then, no one had enacted an economy-wide policy capping emissions. We now have actual experience with such policies, most notably in California, which has had a cap in place since 2013. The observant may have noted that the sky hasn’t fallen in California. However, this proof point hasn’t stopped modelers from playing chicken little. Such is the case with an FTI Consulting review on the economic effects of a policy capping emissions in Oregon. The study doesn’t find an immediate negative impact on Oregon’s economy, instead, it focuses on how bad things will be thirty years in the future.

The focus on economic modeling to predict future outcomes, ignores the long history of models consistently and grossly over-estimating the negative economic effects. Rather than fixating on theoretical models, it would be beneficial to look to the actual economic effects of policies in action—California’s cap or a sulfur emissions cap in the eastern U.S. These examples are perhaps a more instructive guide on the economic implications of capping greenhouse gas emissions in Oregon.


Research and Resources

Gaps in an Oregon Cap and Trade Analysis Must Be Addressed to Ensure Informed Policy Decisions.
Erik Wohlgemuth, LinkedIn, April 10, 2017


Top News Headlines

California Court Upholds Cap-and-Trade Ruling, Clears Way For Extension To 2030
Ecosystem Marketplace, April 7, 2017

Cap And Trade Is Off To A Good Start In Ontario. Now Let It Go To Work.
The Huffington Post, April 7, 2017

Gutting Climate Rules Will Slow Job Growth
The Huffington Post, March 28, 2017


Nothing But Clear Skies Blog

We Can Meet the U.S. Paris Commitment without Federal Support
Peter Weisberg, The Climate Trust, February 8, 2017

Low Carbon Policies Create Jobs and Spur a Healthy Economy
Kristen Kleiman, The Climate Trust,  March 20, 2017

Image credit: Flickr/Bemep

Tags
Adaptation
Aggregation
American Carbon Registry
Biochar
Blue Carbon
C-AGG
California Air Resources Board
California Carbon Info
Cap and Invest
carbon offset standards
Carbon Pricing
Carbon-Pulse
Clean Power Plan
Climate Action Reserve
Climate Bonds
Conservation Finance Network
Corporate Social Responsibility
CORSIA
Culture
Dairy Digester
Ecosystem Marketplace
Edible Portland
Energy Central
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice
EPAF
Farm Power Northwest
GreenBiz
IPCC
Job Announcement
Leadership
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Milestone
Oregon Carbon Dioxide Standard
Oregon Clean Fuels Program
Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council
Oregon Global Warming Commission
Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy
Paris
Portland General Electric
REDD
Renewable Fuel Standard
Renewable Identification Numbers
Request For Proposal
RGGI
Rice
Risk Management
Scientific American
Social Cost of Carbon
Supply Chain
Sustainable Business Oregon
Triple Pundit
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Verified Carbon Standard
Western Climate Initiative
Recent Comments
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Proud Member Partners in Diversity
  • DONATE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

©2020 The Climate Trust. Crafted by ILLUSIO