• Who We Are
    • The Climate Trust
    • Climate Trust Capital
    • Achievements
    • Leadership And Board Of Directors
  • What We Do
    • Action
    • Impact
    • Case Studies
  • Financials
  • Media
    • Blog
    • News & Press
The Climate Trust | Cap and trade programs are an effective tool to reduce GHG emissions and electricity costs, while bolstering the economy.

Cap and trade programs are an effective tool to reduce GHG emissions and electricity costs, while bolstering the economy.

Climate Finance, Scorcher

The August 2019 Western Climate Initiative (WCI) carbon allowance auction was oversubscribed by 150%.  Although prices were not as high as the May 2019 auction, the settlement price was still $1.54 over the price floor.  Of the bidders, investor participation (defined as those not required to participate in the cap and trade program) was about the same as May 2019.  However for future allowances, about 29% of bidders were investors– a 14% increase over May’s results. We see increasing investor participation as a positive sign that cap and trade is gaining strength.

As we digest the data from WCI’s 20th auction, it is worth mentioning two recent reports that assess the broader positive results of cap and trade programs.  Currently there are two cap and trade programs in the US – California’s (WCI) and the northeastern states’ Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI).  These reports assess the effectiveness of the programs, not just in terms of greenhouse gas reductions, but in larger contexts – economic development, electricity costs, and funds available for renewable energy.  The news is good.

First, RGGI. An August 2019 Acadia Center report that reviewed the past 10 years of the program finds the following:

  • CO2 emissions from RGGI power plants fell by 47%
  • Electricity prices in RGGI states fell by 5.7%, while prices have increased in the rest of the country by 8.6%
  • GDP in RGGI states grew by 47%, outpacing growth in rest of the country by 31%
  • RGGI states have generated $3.2 billion in allowance auction proceeds, the majority of which have been invested in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs

For California’s program an August 2019 release by Governor Newsom’s office offered this assessment:

  • 2017 emissions decreased by 14% since peak levels in 2004
  • GHG emissions fell below the 2020 reduction target for the second year in a row
  • California’s economy grew by 3.6 % – 1.4 % above the national average

So, despite an increase in population, California’s total GHG emissions decreased, while its economy improved.  In addition, over its lifetime, California’s cap and trade program has generated $11 billion in proceeds to support programs that reduce GHGs and promote energy efficiency.

As cap and trade programs mature, it becomes abundantly clear they are an effective way of addressing climate change and refute the notion that they are a drag on the economy or that they leave out broad segments of the population.  When electricity prices drop, when the air is cleaner and when employment increases, that’s good for everyone, not just corporations as some suggest.   Cap and trade is an effective tool – not a panacea – in the fight against climate change.  Other states, like Pennsylvania and New Mexico, and some presidential candidates are paying attention.  Let’s hope more do.

Tags
Adaptation
Aggregation
American Carbon Registry
Biochar
Blue Carbon
C-AGG
California Air Resources Board
California Carbon Info
Cap and Invest
carbon offset standards
Carbon Pricing
Carbon-Pulse
Clean Power Plan
Climate Action Reserve
Climate Bonds
Conservation Finance Network
Corporate Social Responsibility
CORSIA
Culture
Dairy Digester
Ecosystem Marketplace
Edible Portland
Energy Central
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice
EPAF
Farm Power Northwest
GreenBiz
IPCC
Job Announcement
Leadership
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Milestone
Oregon Carbon Dioxide Standard
Oregon Clean Fuels Program
Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council
Oregon Global Warming Commission
Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy
Paris
Portland General Electric
REDD
Renewable Fuel Standard
Renewable Identification Numbers
Request For Proposal
RGGI
Rice
Risk Management
Scientific American
Social Cost of Carbon
Supply Chain
Sustainable Business Oregon
Triple Pundit
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Verified Carbon Standard
Western Climate Initiative
Recent Comments
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Proud Member Partners in Diversity
  • DONATE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

©2020 The Climate Trust. Crafted by ILLUSIO