• Who We Are
    • The Climate Trust
    • Climate Trust Capital
    • Achievements
    • Leadership And Board Of Directors
  • What We Do
    • Action
    • Impact
    • Case Studies
  • Financials
  • Media
    • Blog
    • News & Press
The Climate Trust | Do young forests sequester more carbon in the Pacific Northwest?

Do young forests sequester more carbon in the Pacific Northwest?

Forestry, Scorcher

Age-class and carbon storage are positively correlated across forests in the PNW.

The forests of the Pacific Northwest Coast Range and Western Cascades are some of the most productive in the world containing many large and longed lived tree species such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, and redwoods in the south. Due to this productivity, forests in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) are some of the best methods of carbon capture available, able to store up to 1673.5 mtCO2/ acre (total ecosystem carbon), including as much as 600 to +700 mtCO2e /acre in above ground live carbon (1). To put that in perspective, Oregonians emit an average of around 10 mtCO2 a year per capital. Current and historic forest management practices sequester far less than their ecological potential, as demonstrated in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Area and carbon totals across ownerships for all of Oregon, the OR Coast Range and West Cascades ecoregions from 2007-2016. Source: USFS FIA

 Eco-section and Owner Group Area in 1000 acres Above Ground Live C Total  mtCO2e/acre
All OR
NFS unreserved (timbered) 11,606 455,271 130.6
NFS reserved 2,466 117,983 159.3
Other federal 3,759 161,303 142.8
State and local 1,148 49,862 144.6
Private corporate 6,585 164,232 83.0
Private non-corporate 4,091 90,545 73.7
All owners 29,655 1,039,197 116.6
Oregon Coast Range
NFS unreserved 722 61,762 284.7
NFS reserved 73 5,759 262.6
Other federal 792 62,303 261.9
State and local 714 38,326 178.7
Private corporate 2,346 76,393 108.4
Private non-corporate 607 21,286 116.7
All owners 5,254 265,828 168.4
Western Cascades
NFS unreserved 3,167 215,632 226.6
NFS reserved 1,161 76,595 219.6
Other federal 616 39,106 211.3
State and local 51 2,848 185.9
Private corporate 1,312 39,058 99.1
Private non-corporate 371 13,021 116.8
All owners 6,678 386,260 192.5

Age-class and carbon storage are positively correlated across forests in the PNW. In Oregon, nearly two-thirds (63%) of private forestland in the Coast Range are less than 40 years old. Increasing age class diversity and average age in this region could have profoundly positive carbon impacts. Recent analysis found that extending rotations on the average growing site in the Coast Range from 40 to 90 years could sequester an additional 216 mtCO2e/acre over the interim 50 years (gross estimate). Moving the 862,000 acres of private coastal timberland in Oregon currently between the ages of 31 – 50 years to the 81 – 90-year age class could result in a gross estimated overall gain of over 200,000,000 mtCO2e over the next 40 to 50 years.

Advocates of short rotation forestry have focused their message on the fact that ‘healthy, younger’ forest sequester carbon faster than older forests. While this message is not necessarily untrue, as usual, the devil is in the details. In this case, the key detail is how you define a ‘young’ versus an ‘old’ forest and the timeframe over which you are comparing stand-level carbon sequestration. Dr. Andrew Gray of the USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis program has studied carbon accumulation rates in the PNW at length and published several papers on the topic. In a 2016 paper, Gray and others found that the average PNW forest stand accumulates 75% of its maximum carbon by age 127, plus or minus 35 years (2). In another publication, Watts, Gray and others show that stands over 150 years old do not accumulate additional carbon as quickly as younger stands due to increasing mortality rates, however, these stands do store significant amounts of carbon for long periods.

Proponents of short-rotation management are using the ‘younger is better’ mantra to promote current harvest rotations of 30-60 years (40 year average for coastal Douglas Fir). The reality is these forests are just beginning to realize their carbon sequestering potential when they are harvested. This is where the concept of substitution becomes very important in forest carbon accounting. To close the carbon gap between short and long rotations, studies have relied heavily on the substitution carbon pool (3). This is a hypothetical carbon pool created by the assumption that in-leu of long-term wood products, such as dimensional lumber, more carbon intense building materials like concrete and steel would be used. Only as the modeled benefits of carbon in wood products and substitution accumulate over time do short rotations start to look more climate friendly than allowing forests to reach their prime growing years (4).

Of course, older forests also provide a host other environmental and social non-carbon co-benefits such as wildlife habitat, clean water, and biodiversity. The take-away is that positioning short-rotation, high-utilization forest management as climate positive relies on many assumptions regarding harvest and utilization rates, end product usage, and potential substitute materials. Allowing forests to reach their optimal growth years is known to accumulate substantially more carbon in forests while eventually providing an increased volume of higher quality wood products.

For more information on the climate impacts of rotation length in the PNW I invite readers to check out Kate Anderson’s work at Sightline Institute:   https://www.sightline.org/series/forest-rotations/

 

1. Smithwick et al. 2002. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3099973?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
2. Gray, A. N., Whittier, T. R., & Harmon, M. E. (2016). Carbon stocks and accumulation rates in Pacific Northwest forests: role of stand age, plant community, and productivity. Ecosphere, 7(1), e01224
3. E.g., Perez-Garcia, et al., 2005a & b, 2006, Gustavsson et al., 2017
4. Managing Moist Forests if the Pacific Northwest United States for Climate Positive Outcomes. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/10/618

Tags
Adaptation
Aggregation
American Carbon Registry
Biochar
Blue Carbon
C-AGG
California Air Resources Board
California Carbon Info
Cap and Invest
carbon offset standards
Carbon Pricing
Carbon-Pulse
Clean Power Plan
Climate Action Reserve
Climate Bonds
Conservation Finance Network
Corporate Social Responsibility
CORSIA
Culture
Dairy Digester
Ecosystem Marketplace
Edible Portland
Energy Central
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice
EPAF
Farm Power Northwest
GreenBiz
IPCC
Job Announcement
Leadership
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Milestone
Oregon Carbon Dioxide Standard
Oregon Clean Fuels Program
Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council
Oregon Global Warming Commission
Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy
Paris
Portland General Electric
REDD
Renewable Fuel Standard
Renewable Identification Numbers
Request For Proposal
RGGI
Rice
Risk Management
Scientific American
Social Cost of Carbon
Supply Chain
Sustainable Business Oregon
Triple Pundit
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Verified Carbon Standard
Western Climate Initiative
Recent Comments
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Proud Member Partners in Diversity
  • DONATE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

©2020 The Climate Trust. Crafted by ILLUSIO