• Who We Are
    • The Climate Trust
    • Climate Trust Capital
    • Achievements
    • Leadership And Board Of Directors
  • What We Do
    • Action
    • Impact
    • Case Studies
  • Financials
  • Media
    • Blog
    • News & Press
The Climate Trust | New FMU carbon offset product is appropriate for a range of emissions.

New FMU carbon offset product is appropriate for a range of emissions.

Climate Finance, Forestry

Climate Action Reserve’s (CAR) Climate Forward program has excellent potential to incentivize reforestation with carbon finance, but the program’s Forecasted Mitigation Units (FMU’s) need to be better understood by voluntary carbon credit buyers.

FMU’s are the conservatively forecasted emissions reductions resulting from the implementation of a project. This is in contrast to traditional carbon offsets, which are strictly associated with the year in which those emissions reductions take place and are issued after the reduction occurs. Issuing forecasted credits is critical for reforestation projects whose sequestration rates may take a number of years to really take off. Without the up-front generation of credits, it is very difficult to fund reforestation with carbon finance. With the launch of the One Trillion Tree Initiative at the 2020 World Economic Forum and a number of corporations already committed to carbon reductions through reforestation, reforestation FMUs can play a big role.

With FMUs being so new (Climate Forward was launched in 2018), some confusion exists around which emissions are appropriate to offset with them. There are at least three types of emissions where FMUs could be used.

First, as identified on Climate Forward’s website, are the future emissions associated with new developments or facilities. In fact, FMUs are already being used for mitigation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which requires that new developments mitigate their greenhouse gas emissions. Certain state utility programs are also a good fit for FMUs. For example, The Climate Trust offsets the forecasted emissions from Oregon energy facilities whose mitigation was required at the time of construction.

Emissions from downstream Scope 3 emissions are also an appropriate use of FMUs, although not every company tracks these emissions or attempts to offset them. Downstream Scope 3 emissions are future emissions that include transportation of a product to market, use of a product, end-of-life treatment, and other activities.

Finally, voluntary buyers that take a more values-based approach that emphasizes mitigation types over a timebound reduction commitment might wish to consider purchasing FMUs. Such purchases could make the difference as to whether the emission reduction project happens. Timing concerns aside, providing the upfront funding for a project to happen is very impactful in and of itself.

FMUs have the potential to greatly incentivize reforestation. Entities looking to offset their emissions or support reforestation should consider reforestation FMUs for their carbon credit portfolios.

 

Climate Forward
Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Standards

Tags
Adaptation
Aggregation
American Carbon Registry
Biochar
Blue Carbon
C-AGG
California Air Resources Board
California Carbon Info
Cap and Invest
carbon offset standards
Carbon Pricing
Carbon-Pulse
Clean Power Plan
Climate Action Reserve
Climate Bonds
Conservation Finance Network
Corporate Social Responsibility
CORSIA
Culture
Dairy Digester
Ecosystem Marketplace
Edible Portland
Energy Central
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice
EPAF
Farm Power Northwest
GreenBiz
IPCC
Job Announcement
Leadership
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Milestone
Oregon Carbon Dioxide Standard
Oregon Clean Fuels Program
Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council
Oregon Global Warming Commission
Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy
Paris
Portland General Electric
REDD
Renewable Fuel Standard
Renewable Identification Numbers
Request For Proposal
RGGI
Rice
Risk Management
Scientific American
Social Cost of Carbon
Supply Chain
Sustainable Business Oregon
Triple Pundit
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Verified Carbon Standard
Western Climate Initiative
Recent Comments
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Proud Member Partners in Diversity
  • DONATE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

©2020 The Climate Trust. Crafted by ILLUSIO