• Who We Are
    • The Climate Trust
    • Climate Trust Capital
    • Achievements
    • Leadership And Board Of Directors
  • What We Do
    • Action
    • Impact
    • Case Studies
  • Financials
  • Media
    • Blog
    • News & Press
The Climate Trust | Oregon Cap and Invest Should Allow Aggregation | Scorcher

Oregon Cap and Invest Should Allow Aggregation | Scorcher

Agriculture, Forestry, Grasslands, Policy, Scorcher

Sheldon Zakreski, The Climate Trust
Weekly Policy and Finance Update – November 20, 2017

Bottom line | Aggregation allows small landowners to access carbon markets without sacrificing necessary safeguards.

The State of Oregon established several working groups to advance debate and find common ground on designing a carbon cap and invest bill. The Agriculture, Forests, Fisheries, Rural Communities, and Tribes Work Group became the focal point for discussing the role of offsets in the Bill. This Group recently asked whether a cap and invest program in Oregon should allow for aggregation of offset projects. It was surprising to hear one commenter oppose aggregation on the grounds it was akin to mortgage backed securities. While large financial institutions pushed for a way to split and combine multiple mortgages into an opaque financial product, in carbon markets it’s largely nonprofits pushing for aggregation.

A strong reason to support aggregation is that environmental markets and the safeguards they employ often make it too costly for small projects to access the market; leaving only medium and large projects to take part. Aggregation, by contrast, allows the pooling of several small projects into a single project to streamline management and spread the costs over several project sites. Therefore, aggregation has the promise of overcoming an access barrier by reducing the costs small landowners would face in the carbon market. This can be done without sacrificing safeguards, as auditors can review documentation verifying each landowner’s participation in the aggregated project, and conduct statistically significant sampling of data combined with random site visits.

Opening the market to small landowners is something that should be supported and encouraged in Oregon. A policy that can achieve the dual goals of promoting rural economic development, while generating offsets that can help contain the costs associated with capping greenhouse gas emissions, is worth developing.


Research and Resources

Ducks Unlimited’s Carbon Program
Ducks Unlimited, 2017

Programme of Activities
Wikkipedia, 2017

Forest Health-Human Health Initiative
American Carbon Registry, 2017


Top News Headlines

How US Land Owners Can Tap Carbon Markets In Trump Era
Brian Kittler, Ecosystem Marketplace, January 21, 2017

Opening Carbon Markets to New Participants
Mik McKee, Triple Pundit, August 3, 2015


Nothing But Clear Skies Blog

Aggregation of Offsets Critical for Rice and Agricultural Sector
Robert Parkhurst, Environmental Defense Fund, May 27, 2014


Recent Scorcher

Positive Winds of Climate Policy Sean Penrith, Nov 13, 2017
Leveraging the Private Sector for Scaled up Emissions Reductions Sheldon Zakreski, Nov 6, 2017
A New Phase of Development for California Dairy Digesters Peter Weisberg, Oct 30, 2017

Image credit: Flickr/Bemep

Tags
Adaptation
Aggregation
American Carbon Registry
Biochar
Blue Carbon
C-AGG
California Air Resources Board
California Carbon Info
Cap and Invest
carbon offset standards
Carbon Pricing
Carbon-Pulse
Clean Power Plan
Climate Action Reserve
Climate Bonds
Conservation Finance Network
Corporate Social Responsibility
CORSIA
Culture
Dairy Digester
Ecosystem Marketplace
Edible Portland
Energy Central
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice
EPAF
Farm Power Northwest
GreenBiz
IPCC
Job Announcement
Leadership
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Milestone
Oregon Carbon Dioxide Standard
Oregon Clean Fuels Program
Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council
Oregon Global Warming Commission
Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy
Paris
Portland General Electric
REDD
Renewable Fuel Standard
Renewable Identification Numbers
Request For Proposal
RGGI
Rice
Risk Management
Scientific American
Social Cost of Carbon
Supply Chain
Sustainable Business Oregon
Triple Pundit
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Verified Carbon Standard
Western Climate Initiative
Recent Comments
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Proud Member Partners in Diversity
  • DONATE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

©2020 The Climate Trust. Crafted by ILLUSIO