• Who We Are
    • The Climate Trust
    • Climate Trust Capital
    • Achievements
    • Leadership And Board Of Directors
  • What We Do
    • Action
    • Impact
    • Reforestation
    • Case Studies
  • Financials
  • Media
    • Blog
    • News & Press
The Climate Trust | Oregon’s DEQ Issues Its Preliminary Report on Cap and Reduce Program

Oregon’s DEQ Issues Its Preliminary Report on Cap and Reduce Program

Policy, Scorcher

In March 2020, Oregon’s Governor Brown signed Executive Order 20-04, directing state agencies to take actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The order sets the state’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals to be at least 45% below 1990 levels by 2035 and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. The order also directed Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) to figure out how to meet those goals. Last week, ODEQ issued its preliminary report outlining the cap and reduce program.  The report describes the process, timeline and articulates unresolved issues.  The goal is to have the cap and reduce program finalized in 2021.

The report is not long, and I’d encourage people to read it.  Here are a few takeaways that are worth calling out:

  • The cap and reduce program will be science-based.
  • The program is wide ranging. Greenhouse gases would be capped from large, stationary sources; transportation use (including gas and diesel); and liquid and gaseous fuel industries.
  • Offsets are on the table. Although offsets are not called out explicitly, the report’s language leans that way, allowing emitters “to choose alternative means of complying with an emissions limit, such as contracting with a third party to deliver reductions in emissions by actions at other locations.”
  • Authority to auction allowances and generate revenue for the state appears limited.  The report states “it is likely that the EQC cannot hold an auction to sell compliance instruments, and will need to consider forms of direct distribution…to demonstrate compliance.” Nor can it outsource that role, by opining the state “lacks the authority to distribute compliance instruments to a non-profit, third-party, and then authorize the third-party to sell the compliance instruments at auction, using the auction proceeds to fund greenhouse gas emissions reduction programs.”
  • Trading would be allowed. ODEQ believes they have the authority to oversee a system where compliance entities could use tradable compliance instruments.   Excess direct reductions and offsets represent two potential tradable commodities.

This last point shows ODEQ’s clear understanding of how offsets are an important tool in regulating greenhouse gas emissions.  The report states, “alternative compliance instruments…could mitigate the costs of compliance, while simultaneously producing greater overall emissions reductions.”  Although the report doesn’t address the criteria for project-based reductions (i.e., offsets) directly, ODEQ appears headed in that direction.  That makes sense given California’s cap and trade program’s successful use of offsets as a pathway to provide lower-cost methods of meeting compliance goals.  If that is the case, offsets could play an important role in the early days of Oregon’s cap and reduce program.

Tags
Adaptation
Aggregation
American Carbon Registry
Biochar
Blue Carbon
C-AGG
California Air Resources Board
California Carbon Info
Cap and Invest
carbon offset standards
Carbon Pricing
Carbon-Pulse
Clean Power Plan
Climate Action Reserve
Climate Bonds
Conservation Finance Network
Corporate Social Responsibility
CORSIA
Culture
Dairy Digester
Ecosystem Marketplace
Edible Portland
Energy Central
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice
EPAF
Farm Power Northwest
GreenBiz
IPCC
Job Announcement
Leadership
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Milestone
Oregon Carbon Dioxide Standard
Oregon Clean Fuels Program
Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council
Oregon Global Warming Commission
Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy
Paris
Portland General Electric
REDD
Renewable Fuel Standard
Renewable Identification Numbers
Request For Proposal
RGGI
Rice
Risk Management
Scientific American
Social Cost of Carbon
Supply Chain
Sustainable Business Oregon
Triple Pundit
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Verified Carbon Standard
Western Climate Initiative
Recent Comments
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Proud Member Partners in Diversity
  • DONATE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

©2023 The Climate Trust