Skip to content
News

Price Controls without Cost Controls | Scorcher

Published: July 19, 2017 by Allyah Keith
Sheldon Zakreski, The Climate Trust Weekly Policy and Finance Update - July 17, 2017 California’s plan for a post 2020 cap and trade market is taking shape. Assembly Bill 398 has broad support among industry and environmental groups. The bill mostly continues the cap and trade program that came into effect in 2013, but notably establishes price ceilings for allowances. Price ceilings became a big deal politically after the state passed a new transportation package that increased gasoline taxes; the concern was that extending the program through 2030 would place immediate upward pressure on allowances, which would lead to further energy price increases. The bill creates two price speed bumps whereby if allowances reach a certain price point the state will sell additional allowances held in a reserve at the speed bump price. Despite this concern about price escalation, the bill also does something to improve the odds that the market will hit the price ceilings. Currently, compliance entities have an offset usage limit of 8%, but under AB398, this limit will go down to 4% with a requirement that no more than 2% come from California projects and no more than 2% from out of state projects. The limits go up to 6% total capped at 3% in-state/out of state in 2025. A recent analysis done by CaliforniaCarbon.info for the American Carbon Registry found that this change could add an additional $18 billion in compliance costs for the cap and trade program. While the extension demonstrates California’s continued leadership on climate, it’s curious that while increased costs were such a great concern, AB 398 greatly reduces the ability of offsets to play their role as a source of cost savings for California businesses and taxpayers.

Top News Headlines

Gov. Brown and lawmakers unveil proposal to extend California climate program Los Angeles Times July 10, 2017 California's Cap-And-Trade Compromise Is A Big Step Forward, Not A Win For Polluters Forbes, July 12, 2017 Lawmakers plan Monday vote on extending cap and trade Los Angeles Times, July 12, 2017

Nothing But Clear Skies Blog

California: Outwards, Not Inwards Sean Penrith, The Climate Trust, July 6, 2017 Image credit: Flickr/Bemep
Interested In Earning Revenue From the Carbon Market?

Read More

View All News
hilly forest with a mountain in the distance.

Summer Policy Roundup

Read More
Clean & Prosperous California and Ceres logos

Group of 40+ Organizations Sign Letter Supporting Cap-and-Trade Extension

Read More
California Air Resources Board logo

Offsets are a Core Element in California’s Cap and ‘Invest’ Program

Read More

State Carbon Markets Have Been Challenged Before

Read More

CARB forest offset crediting is conservative

Read More

California ARB buffer mitigates current wildfire risk to forest carbon projects

Read More

Forest fires are sure to increase, but it’s premature to call California’s forest offset insurance pool inadequate

Read More

Climate Trust’s Offset Outlook

Read More

New Report Shows Benefits of Cap and Trade Outweigh Costs

Read More